Archive for July, 2006

How NOT to design roads

Beijing, China | Posted by Terence
Jul 27 2006

For an example of bad road planning, one need not look beyond Beijing. A city of some 3 million cars and 15 million people, Beijing has traffic flow that would generally be accepted by many as terrible. The problem is due not only to having too many cars on too few roads with insufficient public transportation (as of writing Beijing only has three operational subway lines), but is also compounded by badly designed roads.

Let’s take a few examples.

Traffic Scenario 1 1. The architect of this road is a complete nincompoop. What we have here is self explanatory – we have a criss cross traffic flow of cars attempting to head up the onramp to the flyover direct from the main road, whilst meanwhile cars on the subsidiary road attempt to get back to the main road. Of course, we also have cars entering the main road from the subsidiary road, and needless to say that any cars stuck behind another vehicle changing lanes, they too will be delayed thus slowing down whole lanes of traffic.

(NOTE: Primary / Subsidiary roads is a common concept in China, where major roads have parallel subsidiaries used as intermediaries for turning onto or off a primary road).

Traffic Scenario 2 2. This major bottleneck can be found on a flyover not far from GuoMao (国贸) in the CBD area (diagram represents one direction traffic flow only). From a nearby building high up you get an excellent vantage point overlooking this junction (双井桥) and can see exactly where the problem lies – three lanes splits into four, which cars take advantage of, but in the far left lane traffic flow is disrupted by other vehicles joining the overpass, thus causing tailbacks as drivers in lane one must break and/or switch over to lane two or three. It does not help that this process is somewhat repeated about 50 metres down, with lane 1 splitting off elsewhere again.

This junction can easily be improved by maintaining a three lane structure and reserving the additional lane exclusively for cars entering or leaving the junction. Simple lane markings or dividers (possibly more effective in Beijing) can keep other cars out, and will give cars joining or exiting the roads sufficient time to adjust speed accordingly.

Traffic Scenario 3 3. You’ll find this culprit on the Airport Expressway (机场高速)leading towards town at the junction turning onto the third ring road heading west (北三环路). Yes, it’s a 90 degree turn off a highway – with terrible signage. Needless to say, drivers heading in this direction will find themselves breaking to a near crawl then hastily turning the corner no doubt also causing trouble behind.

Many junctions in Beijing are plagued with the problem of having insufficient headway at the junctions for cars to make speed adjustments. In addition to this, a ‘turn right on red’ rule which just isn’t suitable for China, lights which are green in multiple directions, and two tiered junctions make driving in China so much more confusing – and chaotic. With the majority of air pollution in Beijing coming from traffic, and with idling engines creating 30% more pollution than a moving one, sorting out Beijing’s traffic problem will come a long way to solving it’s pollution problem too.

What Beijing needs now is a much improved public transport network (this they are working on, with the construction now of several new underground lines) – but increased education for drivers is also essential and, more importantly, the design and layout of the road network needs serious review. Many of the problems on the road are just down to bad planning: Beijing may physically have excellent well maintained roads, but if not designed properly, they aren’t useful for cruising at 10km/h anyway.

We have moved!

Beijing, General | Posted by Terence
Jul 26 2006

It might explain why my postings have been rather few and far between lately, with everyone at work being extremely busy lately dealing with several things all happening at the same time including, I might add, having to find and move into a new office.

After much debate and effort spent fending off over-eager property agents, we have finally settled in the GuoMao (国贸) area in the Central Business District of Beijing. This marks a complete change of environment from the ZhongGuanCun region up in Haidian District (中关村,海淀区) – which although contains a number of renowned high-tech companies, is comparatively lacking in convenience and notably less cosmopolitan.

Over the next few days we’ll be settling down more into our new dwellings and hopefully getting back into the flow of work.

Until then, it’s back to getting my hands dirty…

You have the right to remain ignorant

Beijing, China | Posted by Terence
Jul 08 2006

One of the biggest problems with China is information flow – or rather, the lack of it. This is particularly true in Beijing, where red tape is rife and knowledge non-existent.

Enquire about the procedure for setting up a company, or registering an ICP license, or heck – even asking for directions – and you will probably get a clueless response at best, or ten different answers at worst. Knowledge is a big problem in this country, and the effective dissemination of it an even bigger one.

Ultimately for every decision made in government, someone must know what’s going on. But a huge problem with this middle kindgom is that too many laws still remain subjective – and a huge part of the government bureaucracy depends upon Guanxi: personal relations between those in power and those who need favours. The result of this is that for any decision made, an exception is generally possible, and for any new law or legislative amendment issued, you can be sure there are ways around the problem… if you knock on the right doors.

One week ago a new directive was issued in Beijing: businesses must now be registered at commercial addresses only. Residential / mixed-residential are no longer accepted. Whilst this is reasonable (in-line with overseas practice), such legislative changes obviously have huge implications and impact upon the business sector in the city. Indeed, much of the cities businesses operate out of residential premises. What is necessary is a consultation period, followed by notification of the law and a grace period for businesses and property developers to adapt. The Chinese method though, naturally, is to issue a directive overnight, let the people ‘discover’ the law, not provide a grace period – and then as problems arise over time (“oh really? some business owners will be screwed?”), make amendments to the bill by fudging it slowly and making it more vague so that a few people in the relevant departments can deal with individual cases at their own discretion (e.g. – who gives the nicest gifts). This general problem is not uncommon: try to find solid information about any bureaucratic process here, and you will likely be none the wiser after 5 phone calls.

Welcome to politics 101, Chinese style.

The ‘information problem’ is deep rooted and not easy to fix : while China continues with its process of reform, it struggles also to maintain harmony across the country and keep the rural communities at bay. The Chinese government fears information flow – particularly those ideas that may lead to counter-revolutionary thought or compromise the existence of the ruling party. Freedom of speech is of course a big no no here.

But how about culture? Society in China has for centuries been very much confirmist: the young and inexperienced are supposed to learn from the wise and elderly. Until recently, innovation has not been encouraged and free thinking a definite taboo. There is no culture of sharing information, of discussing problems, of consulting over important issues that affect many people, or of confronting one’s superiors. People in China aren’t meant to talk back: the status quo is to shut up, and do as your told. And if you don’t know something don’t bother asking, ‘cos i’m not going to tell you!

I’d hate to think how much money is lost in the national economy due to inefficiences of information flow, but doubtless that figure is not small. If China wishes to continue growing its standing on the global stage, this is one serious problem that needs addressing. But the good news for Hong Kong at least is that, until then, that there is still value in conducting business in the SAR… and this looks to continue for many years.

The only question is… when will China eventually catch up?