Archive for the ‘Hong Kong’ Category

Visa free access to Russia!

Hong Kong, Travel | Posted by Terence
Aug 01 2009

Those Hong Kong passport holders out there may be interested to know that as of July 1st 2009, a mutual visa free arrangement between Hong Kong and Russia will allow visa-free access between both regions for a period of 14 days.

Russia isn’t high on my list of places to visit, but this is certainly welcoming news. Being so close, it even sounds mildly tempting…

Edit – Noting that many people get here searching ‘visa free access China’ in Google, note the following:

1) Only passport holders from Singapore, Brunei, and Japan can visit China visa-free for up to 15 days. Visitors from Hong Kong, Macau, or Taiwan should use a separate document issued by mainland authorities for travel.

2) Visa-free access to Russia granted to the following countries as of 28/08/2009 : Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Cuba, Kyrgyzstan, Cuba, Moldova, Tajikistan, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Ukraine, Israel, Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Venezuela, Argentina – and Hong Kong.

Looking for property in China?

Beijing, China, Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Sep 16 2007

Despite my recent absenteeism from this blog, we have now launched Jipingmi.com, the property seeking site for China with a focus on both quality, and quantity of listings. The site is currently in Chinese only but an English version is forthcoming.

Amongst other features, Jipingmi currently aggregates job listings from over 20 sites and separates agent listings from direct postings.

Now, if only our site was ready before we had to find ourselves a new office!

Happy not-quite-independance!

China, Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Jul 08 2007

Happy Independance Day to those friends in the USA, albeit four days late… or Happy Canada Day to those in Canada – eight days late. To be politically correct, I should also wish those in Burundi, Somalia, Rwanda, Belarus, Venezuela, and Malawi best wishes for their national days!

Then last but not least of course, Happy SAR day to those in Hong Kong – though I often wonder what it is we’re celebrating.

Yet again another article appears in the SCMP, part of a long string of articles debating the future of Hong Kong’s democratic reform: this time the DAB suggesting that there should be no universal sufferage on chief executive elections earlier than 2017, with full legco elections coming even later. This only a couple of months after DAB chairman Ma Lik ignorantly played down the events of the 1989 Tiannanmen Square ‘incident’.

The article laughably suggests that each “candidate must obtain 50 votes from a nomination board of 800 members before being put in a ‘one man, one vote’ election by the public or legco – with a similar 800 member nomination committee for chief executive. In another words – universal sufferage, but you can only pick from pre-approved candidates (by Beijing, no doubt).

It is of course times like this when you feel like practicing voodoo is a good idea – or to find a punching bag effigy of the said idiot and whack the living daylights out of it.

How one can be a complete stooge, a mouthpiece of a one party state with total disrespect for freedom of speech, a man who claims to be patriotic but not giving the slightest damn about people’s general aspirations, a spinless coward who has profited personally from being friendly to Beijing… it’s amazing what can come out of some people’s mouthes.

Watching shows in Beijing celebrating the 10th anniversary since the ‘Great Hong Kong Takeaway’, all the fanfare here is praising the central government support for Hong Kong, Hong Kong’s economic development – they of course all paint a rosey picture. It’s no surprise there are no mentions of the real struggles back at home. In watching the BBC’s reminiscing of the final few years of colonial rule under Chris Patten you get a very different picture – Patten’s efforts for last minute government reform; moves appreciated now by most but having enraged many at the time, mostly tycoons who have profited from befriending the Communist party. Gordon Wu (chairman of Hopewell Holdings) was even quoted to suggest self censorship would not be a problem and would not bother him.

China is by and large a very different place now to fifteen years ago – but deep down the same core problems exist. Pathetic would be a good phrase to describe the leadership here. Much has been achieved in concrete terms, economically and politically, but the tit for tat childish behaviour of key figures continues.

And yet, with 40 years to go till 2049, it’s happening in Hong Kong too.

The central government ought to speed up their brainwashing – at least by then 40 years later, we’d all be too ignorant to complain.

Beijing worried over mock election

Beijing, China, Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Nov 16 2006

It’s nothing new that Beijing doesn’t like elections – but apparently it seems they dislike mock ones too.

From the SCMP:

“Beijing has expressed concern that a plan to launch a community referendum to gauge the public’s view on who should be the next chief executive would undermine Donald Tsang Yam-kuen’s credibility”

In other words, if someone else gets “elected”, which is possible, then the presumed lack of support for Donald Tsang would undermine his role as chief executive when someone else should be there instead. Well gosh – isn’t that the point of elections? In a democratic society you pick the leader and they lead with the mandate of the people. That Hong Kong people should be denied the right to pick their leader is insulting enough – that Beijing should then complain about a non-binding poll taking place is just ludicrous.

Cyd Ho Sau-lan, organiser of the project, was quoted to comment that:

“…the best way for them to get an acceptable result would be to convince the public that the person Beijing supports is good”

- I couldn’t agree more. It would be far more constructive for Beijing to try and gain support for the candidate they’re fielding than to waste time complaining about opposition figures. Granted some may see the poll as a pointless exercise that would achieve nothing except create discontent, but I believe instability won’t be easy to come by in Hong Kong and that on the contrary such a poll would send a strong signal to the government.

Of course some may fear that the poll would give a mandate to Donald Tsang, should he win. But, if this is the case then I say congratulations to him – and likewise to the democrats, they should try harder next time to win the support of the people.

HK Skyline

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Apr 02 2006

Owner Luigi of diserio.com has voted Hong Kong as having the best skyline in the world. With 43 buildings over 200 metres tall it is, afterall, quite impressive – and he’s not wrong to note that the hilly backdrop makes this even more special.

Having spent most of my life in Hong Kong, I have grown to love the city skyline. Although I have admired many others on my travels, I still believe that nothing compares to that at home – the hills in particular. It’s nice to see i’m not the only one who thinks this.

The bottom of Luigi’s page also has a link to a more impirical ranking of the world’s skylines.

Pantyhose tea, anyone?

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Mar 08 2006

I stumbled across this article on CNN today – apparently this has been going on for years, but this is the first i’ve heard of it!

I myself am not much of a tea connoisseur, but i’m not sure i’d want to order a drink associated with pantyhose. In any case though, I certainly hope it’s not used pantyhose!

Democracy? Who needs it anyways!

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Dec 23 2005

Hong Kong legislators voted on wednesday against the democracy reform proposals. The result: 34 for and 24 against (40 votes are needed from the chamber of 60 for constitutional reform packages to pass). In reaction to the defeat, chief executive Donald Tsang warns that mutual trust between Hong Kong and Mainland lawmakers will suffer. From the SCMP:

“This is a major issue. You cannot say, `oh it’s game over, let’s do it again’. This is not on.”

Mr Tsang believed the olive branches extended by Beijing in recent months – such as inviting all lawmakers to visit the mainland – would not be forthcoming again in the near future.

“You cannot bully people and not expect them to get angry.”

Wait… who’s bullying who here?

“The outcome cannot be swept aside as if it has never happened. It’s not child’s play”.

I can say for sure that the outcome will not be swept aside – the democrats certainly have no desire to do that. They will, of course, continue to fight for a fair solution to electoral reform. And why Donald would even hint at the suggestion elections are child’s play is beyond me – the problem in Hong Kong is that the government thinks the electorate are children.

Granted, a certain portion of the people do act childish at times – but sometimes I question whether the real toddlers are the electorate or the government.

openDemocracy on Hong Kong

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
Dec 10 2005

Agnes Chong writes an article in openDemocracy.net giving her views of the December 4th march and electoral reform process.

Amongst her comments, she notes that:
In Beijing, the Hong Kong demonstration received the usual “media blackout” treatment. This is as much a reflection of the Chinese government’s kneejerk paranoia, as the march ostensibly has no bearing on the ordinary Chinese person’s life today. It would seem a long stretch to regard the Hong Kong demonstration as a precursor to any kind of social unrest in the mainland.

True enough, there was certainly no media coverage at all here in Beijing regarding movements in Hong Kong. But to think that a mention of protests in China would directly lead to unrest in China is somewhat misleading. Indeed, protests are already occuring in China: 20 are alleged to have been killed in Guangdong (廣東) last week in village protests. As China continues to prosper and education improves, such continued unrest is inevitable.

If anything is to be learned from Hong Kong, it is that peaceful protest and freedom of speech are not detrimental to social and economic development. China should learn from this, not shun it.