Archive for the ‘Hong Kong’ Category

Jaywalking fine ain’t chicken feed!

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
May 31 2005

A chicken apparently came close to being fined US$54 for jaywalking in California. Says the BBC:

“Linc and Helena Moore had been fined on 26 March after their chicken wandered onto a road in the small rural mining town of Johannesburg in Kern county.”

Lucky for the Moore’s the case was thrown out:

“The fine was dismissed after a lawyer for the bird’s owners argued that the fowl was domesticated and could not be classified as livestock.”

Under California livestock laws (#16902) – A person that owns or controls the possession of any livestock shall not willfully or negligently permit any of the livestock to stray upon, [or end up on] a public highway.

- which of course makes sense. Afterall, farmers should be responsible for looking after their livestock; and chicken are no exception. So the next time you see a chicken crossing the road, don’t bother asking it why – just call the cops.

Persecuted in Hong Kong?!?

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
May 31 2005

On the 8:30 ABC Asia Pacific news tonight : a Chinese couple who face deportation for a failed asylum application. The couple reportedly cited the 1989 pro-democracy demonstrations in Beijing as their reasons for eligibility. What’s intriguing about this story is that the couple are from Hong Kong.

Some details were available through the ABC News Website, but strangely the article makes no mention of the couples origin. What amazes me is that this couple ever thought that they could get asylum in the first place on the grounds of persecution at home, when ever since the Tiannanmen Square “incident” thousands have demonstrated annually right on the streets of Hong Kong. This is one heck of a way (ultimately unsuccessful, I might add) to gain citizenship of another country! They achieved partial success – Mr & Mrs. Lo’s kids were granted Australian citizenship; but now the parents must go home.

Whether it was part of the deliberate plot to get the kids citizenship I don’t know – I failed to get further details. But it is clear that the concept of “thinking outside the box”, so proudly practiced by Hong Kong people, is often taken too far! If it’s any consolation – for all that has eroded in freedoms and liberties in Hong Kong recently, it’s still nice to see the city declared by some as ‘safe to demonstrate in without fear of persecution’.

If only the Lo’s had burnt a flag before their departure!

Now the luncheon meat talks

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
May 19 2005

Tuesday’s Technology Post in the SCMP highlighted the problem faced by many Hong Kong people these days : mobile spam.

Recorded sales messages – delivered at high speed through annoyingly high-pitched monologues – are now a mainstay of using a mobile phone in Hong Kong.

Answered in Hong Kong, these unsolicited calls may be little more than a rude interruption. Answering overseas, however, involves expensive roaming charges.

My last roaming bill from three days in Singapore/Malaysia was some $1600 – part of that thanks to sales calls I received during my trip. Telephone spam is becoming an increasing problem in Hong Kong, in a city that lacks legislation banning such cold calling to mobile telephones (many countries have laws against this). I easily receive at least four spam calls a week to my cell phone – usually a combination of both automated and human calls. Unfortunately, most have their caller ID’s blocked – now leaving me weary about answering unidentified calls. One such call was from Wharf Telecom (no caller ID) – they were advertising a service to “unblock all caller ID’s”. Oh the irony! But they don’t win my custom ; congratulations, they’ve now made my blacklist.

Sadly, most people in Hong Kong lack education of the fundamental moral principals of privacy and would fail to see the ethical problems of employing such tactics in the workplace. Education is definitely the key – business owners need to be convinced that there are better ways of marketing their products, and that treating your customers well is the prelude to a good long term relationship. Unfortunately, some Hong Kongers still have the “earn more now ; who cares if we see them again” mentality.

It’s good that the government is finalising an anti-spam bill – albeit not to be tabulated to Legco till 2006. Although it currently excludes voice spamming, this will hopefully be included in the legislation too. Nonetheless, such legislation has been long awaited – all I can hope is that punishments are severe. Nine years would satisfy me… per word.

Fluffy Bun Towers

Hong Kong | Posted by Terence
May 10 2005

n: tra·di·tion

1 : an inherited, established, or customary pattern of thought, action, or behavior

OK – so someone explain to me please, how making a mockery of the Cheung Chau Bun Festival by replacing the buns with “cakes or dolls” constitutes reviving a tradition? Although the Hong Kong government has finally agreed to bring back the traditional bun tower scramble after a ban of 27 years, they have already replaced the bamboo structure with steel, and participants must now first undergo training sessions by certified mountain climbers. Now they’re already talking about making the bun scramble a year-round event and replacing the buns with other items. Why? Because it would apparently make a good tourist attraction.

From the SCMP:

He [Secretary for Home Affairs Patrick Ho Chi-ping] said the steamed buns which are the usual targets of the climbers could be replaced with “cakes or dolls” and the quasi-religious event staged instead as a sporting challenge.

[Kwong Kwok-wai agrees:]

“I think it is an excellent idea, as many more people can try climbing the bun tower and get a taste of tradition. Scrambling for the buns is just a gimmick. I don’t mind replacing the buns with other things.”

Does the government not understand the definition of a tradition? To turn an annual event into a year-round affair, then remove the key feature of the festival itself (the innocent steamed bun) and replace it with something totally irrelevant is nothing short of a complete joke. Whilst I agree that change to all things is inevitable, and by all means safety is a factor, but you don’t exactly see the authorities in Pamplona banning bulls in the bull run, nor the Gloucestershire County Council taking the cheese and hill away from the famous cheese roll. They certainly don’t hold it every day. How can you possibly call scrambling for buns in the bun festival a gimmick? The buns are the bun festival!

Oh the wonders of a capitalist society run by a misled government!